[whohit]Compassionate camaraderie between enemy pilots during ww2[/whohit]
Firing at meaning. My views about life and people reflected in verse
Let’s be honest about our existence
Firing at (understanding) meaning. It is a challenge to do so
The words above are an example of the style of text that you will find in my verse presentation.
What follows is an extensive series of verse that I created twenty years ago. At the time I was recovering from a complex surgical procedure, a period in which I had an ample opportunity to think not only about life but also what life may mean. I originally structured the verse in order to encourage people, including myself, to think about their everyday lives and what life really means to them. I also created them in order to encourage people to look more closely at themselves and others around them. You will discover that my verse are generally cryptic. Often they have different meanings. Occasionally I picked up on the ideas of others and remodeled their views into a form that I felt was complimentary to the broader style and nature of my own effort. Some of my readers may find some sort of deeper meaning in parts of my work. In summary I have done my best to encourage people like you and me to scratch a little deeper beyond the superficial gloss that we have so successfully draped across our culture and associated way of life. Regrettably, I now see a minority of verse tend to be sexist and perhaps offensive. This was never intended and remains this way. I never completed this project. One day I abruptly compelled myself to give it away. The untidy conclusion of my presentation is a reflection of this sudden decision. (You will also find another brief introduction to the verse presentation itself).
The verse presentation: Firing at Meaning
[whohit]Firing at meaning My views about life and people reflected in verse[/whohit]
The Connection Between Child Abuse and Bipolar Disorder
There has been discussion in the media about child sex abuse. Once upon a time child abuse both at home and at schools was common. To a lesser degree this type of abuse is still occurring but is probably happening more so in private settings.
Recent research is beginning to demonstrate there is a close link between child abuse and bipolar disorder. Bipolar disorder is serious. Bipolar derivative from child abuse is shown to be associated with lifetime substance abuse, the onset of early illness in life and long term notions of individuals thinking about committing suicide. Some do. In one study about half of bipolar sufferers diagnosed suffered severe stress and anxiety when they were children. From my research into my mild bipolar disorder I have learned many general practitioners are not aware of this connection. I have raised this issue in my post because I feel it is in the public interest to do so. There is a wealth of material online should readers elect to investigate this matter further. I acknowledge that the link below is well outdated.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15684234
[whohit]-the-connection-between-child-abuse-and-bipolar-disorder-[/whohit]
David Bohm believes there is life, mind and wholeness in all things
It seems that the eminent physicist David Bohm was profoundly affected by his association with both Albert Einstein and the internationally respected philosopher Jiddu Krishnamurti
I feel that this is interesting. In this short thirteen minute video presentation Bohm talks about his implicate order theory in physics as it relates to all things [including ontologically]. This includes both the universe as well as wider reality as well. You will notice that the Dalai Lama was present at different times during this discussion. Bohm died in 1992.
[whohit]David Bohm believes there is life mind and wholeness in all things[/whohit]
Why I think David Bohm is a hero of science
Bohm cared to get to the bottom of all things, including reality
It is no secret that I feel David Bohm is amongst the deepest thinking and cleverest scientists of all time. Bohm dared to think about and explain what many other scientists of his generation thought was ludicrous, and was prepared to embrace the most profound ideas of Eastern philosophy into his scientific theories as well.
If you take time to look more closely at the life and times of David Bohm in the attachment, I think you will see the man to be scientifically very insightful and gifted, and a person with a deep sense of personal and social morality as well. He said that each individual in his life is in total contact with all other things (phenomena), including us with each other (his implicate order model). Furthermore, if mankind takes the time to recognize this connectedness then the problems of the world would sort themselves out.
I think if you can understand where Bohm is coming from with his views about science and life in general, you will understand my instinctual views as well, together with the reasons why. I have incorporated two secondary works about the life, times and beliefs of David Bohm. I feel you will find them reasonably straightforward to read and his words gripping and challenging, even if you do not agree with them.
[whohit]-Why I think David Bohm is a hero of science-[/whohit]
A light hearted way of understanding the theory of relativity [temporal reality]
This is a dated comic strip [probably from sometime before the 1960’s] that I feel does a good job in explaining the effects of relativity
Readers should note that the cartoon was produced before the discovery of the lighting effects that occur near to the speed of light.
Quote:
“When Albert Einstein advanced his special theory of relativity in 1905, he turned upside down everything that common sense and science had established about time. He said that time is not absolute, but is a relative quantity that could show one value to one observer while seeming different to a second viewer. The whole thing seemed preposterous.”
References:
http://kvpy2005.blogspot.com.au/2006/09/great-relativity-bomb-plot.html
http://www.willemsplanet.com/2015/05/09/friday-the-relativity-express/
It is against this background that I recommend that you read the attached pdf file:
[whohit]-A-comic-strip-based-on-the-theory-of-relativity-[/whohit]
The art of professional mysticism
I urge you to not set aside ontological/implicit science. Reality is much more than that which is temporal!
“The common division of the world into subject and object, inner world and outer world, body and soul is no longer adequate.” This sentence quotes Ken Wilbur.
This is an older presentation that I have re structured and re-posted. I feel that its contents are timeless and as such they deserve contemporary interest.
These nine quotations below are a reminder to us all that non-local (metaphysical/ontological) physics remains alive and well in all epochs. In my opinion this situation will never change. For example when you think that the Standard model does not say what causes particles to have the properties that they do, or where mass and charge come from you know that there are still huge numbers of metaphysical/ontological ‘gaps’ for them yet to fill. This is with respect to them forming a unified theory of everything. Furthermore, and perhaps more significantly, physicists cannot yet accurately demonstrate that which is microscopic and macroscopic in physics. (Metaphysical/Ontological means ‘things’ that scientists have not yet discovered or been able to scientifically describe and test yet. It does not mean pseudoscience as is commonly believed in the wider community). This is although they mostly know such ‘things’ are real. Consciousness is a good example of this. I believe that one day scientists will be subtly driven to the conclusion that reality-physics is a process. It is a both a pre-geometric and geometric process relative only unto to itself. The original source of the following quotations can be found at the bottom of this blog. All scientists quoted remain highly respected in the science community.
Quote:
Scientists as Mystics
Max Planck
“…I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness. [I say awareness]”
The Observer, London, January 25, 1931 )
Werner Heisenberg
“The common division of the world into subject and object, inner world and outer world, body and soul is no longer adequate.”
Erwin Schroedinger
“Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experiments in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist”.
Schrodinger (1961) claims that the Vedic slogan “All in One and One in All” was an idea that led him to the creation of quantum mechanics.
“Consciousness is never experienced in the plural, only in the singular. How does the idea of plurality (emphatically opposed by the Upanishad writers) arise at all? … the only possible alternative is simply to keep the immediate experience that consciousness is a singular of which the plural is unknown; that there *is* only one thing and that what seems to be a plurality is merely a series of different aspects of this one thing produced by deception (the Indian maya) – in much the same way Gaurisankar and Mt. Everest turn out to be the same peak seen from different valleys.” (From: What is Life)
Sir James Jeans
“Mind no longer appears as an accidental intruder into the realm of matter; we are beginning to suspect that we ought rather to hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter.”
J. Jeans, The Mysterious Universe (New York: Macmillan, 1932), 186.
Sir Arthur S. Eddington
“All through the physical world runs that unknown content, which must surely be the stuff of our consciousness. Here is a hint of aspects deep within the world of physics, and yet unattainable by the methods of physics. And, moreover, we have found that where science has progressed the farthest, the mind has but regained from nature that which the mind has put into nature.”
Sir Arthur S. Eddington, Space, Time and Gravitation: An Outline of the General Relativity Theory (1920)
Bernard d’Espagnat
“the doctrine that the world is made up of objects whose existence is independent of human consciousness turns out to be in conflict with quantum mechanics and with facts established by experiment.”
Bernard d’Espagnat, “The Quantum Theory and Reality,” Scientific American, Vol. 241, No. 5 (November 1979), pp. 158-181.
Roger Penrose
“…the contemporary understanding of material is very different now from the way it used to be. If we consider what matter really is, we now understand it as much more of a mathematical thing…But I think that matter itself is now much more of a mental substance…”
Journal of Consciousness Studies 1:24
Freeman Dyson
“[Is mind] primary or an accidental consequence of something else? The prevailing view among biologists seems to be that the mind arose accidentally out of molecules of DNA or something. I find that very unlikely. It seems more reasonable to think that mind was a primary part of nature from the beginning and we are simply manifestations of it at the present stage of history. It’s not so much that mind has a life of its own but that mind is inherent in the way the universe is built.”
Interview with Freeman Dyson in U.S.News and World Report, April 18, 1988, 72.
[whohit]-The-art-of-professional-mysticism-[/whohit]
Seniors playing pranks in Quebec Canada
Extremely funny video of seniors playing pranks in Quebec Canada
https://youtube.com/watch?v=G0PekTUmBdY%3Ffeature%3Dplayer_embedde
[whohit]Seniors playing pranks in Quebec Canada[/whohit]
Is there a relationship between Gnosis and Science?
Two eminent physicists seem to think that there is
My favorite physicist is David Bohm . My implicit/explicit beliefs (model) are closely aligned to the Hiley-Bohm implicate/explicate physics model. Both models have common features.
These features include there being a curtain-like backdrop to reality in each. I refer to this analogical curtain as being primordial awareness. I believe that there is a strong relationship between Bohm’s concept of Gnosis and science. The attached a PDF file to this blog is entitled “The Cosmic Plenum: Bohm’s Gnosis: The Implicate Order”. You will notice that throughout this file that I have emboldened different sections of text. I strongly urge you to read the emboldened areas. This is because they all have relevance to the wider meaning of both cosmological reality and life.
[whohit]-Is-there-a-relationship-between-Gnosis-and-Science-[/whohit]
Does our conscious awareness exist outside of our body?
This paper by R. Pizzi from the University of Milan seems to have long term important implications for us all. It seems to fit with Bohm’s Infinite Potential Theory. If Bohm’stheory interests you might see my post of some worth. It is very detailed. It incorporates some of Albert Einsteins views about science and its relationship with religion (Bohm and Einstein were great friends)
The implications of the attachment seem to be scientifically significant. I present to you both the abstract as well as a section of the conclusions of this document. What they seem to mean is that our consciousness [awareness] rests outside of our bodies and this in turn opens the door for the possibility that paranormal/metaphysical/cosmic-entangled phenomena can be explained. The original on line document is well dated but when you read it in conjunction with Bohms theory I do not believe that this matters.
Quotes:
“Abstract:
Evidence presented by R. Pizzi from the University of Milan Italy in papers[1,2,3] and derived from personal correspondence [4] suggest that neural network colonies grown from a single cell with identical DNA are able to communicate when they are electromagnetically isolated from each other. If true, the implications of this discovery for brain research, cognitive science, the role of DNA medical applications, and the development of quantum computers are highly significant. This report presents the evidence I have been able to gather to support the veracity of this discovery. Our intention is to determine whether sufficient evidence supports the reality of this effect and whether or not verification experiments and further exploration of these phenomena is warranted.”
Quote drawn from the conclusion of this document:
“…3) What is the correct explanation? If the signals are related and electromagnetic communication can be ruled out what then is the mechanism that connects the two living neurons?
ANSWER: Some form of [metaphysical/ontological] quantum entanglement appear likely candidates however we recommend treating this experiment as an empirical phenomena for which a theory is still to be evolved.
In conclusion we feel the implications of this discovery for brain research, cognitive science, the role of DNA in medical applications, and the development of quantum physics is extremely significant. Furthermore the evidence outlined in this report is compelling enough to justify both further investigation and efforts for organizing verification experiments in an independent laboratory.”
You will find the original online document here
You will find the same document in pdf format here
[whohit]Review of Non-local correlations between Electromagnetically Isolated Neural Networks[/whohit]